The Hydraulic and Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Hard-Rock Aquifer in Southern Johor, Malaysia

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Centre of Tropical Geoengineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor ,MY
  • Centre of Tropical Geoengineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor ,MY
  • School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang ,MY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/32291

Keywords:

Groundwater, Hard-Rock Aquifer, Hydrogeochemistry, Pumping Test.

Abstract

Malaysia is known as a country with a significant amount of surface water. It has a high amount of annual rainfall. Despite Malaysia's large surface water reserves, increased water demand has made supply scarce. Other sources of water, including ground water, are needed to meet the demand. Nowadays, groundwater exploration in Malaysia has been done extensively to explore the nature of groundwater and its aquifer. The aim of the study is to determine the hydraulic characteristics and the hydrogeochemical characteristics of hard-rock aquifer in Southern Johor, Malaysia. This study will provide information about the nature of the hard-rock aquifer in southern Johor, which will help with groundwater exploration in the future. A well known as SP-TW1 is being drilled in a specific area of Gunung Pulai's southwest. The depth of the drilled well is 126 m. Then, a televiewer survey is done to determine the lithology of the well. A series of pumping tests are also done in the well. After the pumping tests are done, a step-drawdown test, constant discharge test and recovery test are done to determine the hydraulic characteristics of the drilled well. The groundwater is also taken as a sample, and it has been sent to a lab to determine the hydrogeochemistry of the well. Based on the pumping test analysis that has been done, the average hydraulic conductivity of the well is 0.0161 m/d, the average transmissivity is 3.088 m2/d and the average storativity is 0.95. According to the data plotted, the drilled well is also determined to be a double-porosity aquifer and fractured aquifer. The total dissolve solid recorded is 200 mg/L and the groundwater sample from the SP-TW1 well mainly contains calcium-bicarbonate (Ca-HCO3) which makes it alkaline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04

How to Cite

S. Fadzil, Mohamad, E. T., & Rathinasamy, V. (2023). The Hydraulic and Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Hard-Rock Aquifer in Southern Johor, Malaysia. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 70(10), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/32291
Received 2023-01-03
Accepted 2023-04-04
Published 2023-04-04

 

References

Heng CL. Groundwater Utilisation and Management in Malaysia. 2004.

Lee KE, Mokhtar M, Mohd Hanafiah M, Abdul Halim A, Badusah J. Rainwater harvesting as an alternative water resource in Malaysia: Potential, policies and development. J Clean Prod. 2016; 126:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.060

Azie RZBR. Universiti Putra Malaysia Characteristics of Groundwater From Fractured Hardrocks in West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. 1997; 1-187.

Sofner B. Groundwater Monitoring and Groundwater Protection in North Kelantan and Perlis, Malaysia. Fed Inst Geosci Nat Resour. 1989;

Banks D, Morland G, Frengstad B. Use of non-parametric statistics as a tool for the hydraulic and hydrogeochemical characterization of hard rock aquifers. Scottish J Geol. 2005; 41(1):69-79. https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg41010069

Singhal BBS. Nature of hard rock aquifers: Hydrogeological uncertainties and ambiguities. Groundw Dyn Hard Rock Aquifers Sustain Manag Optim Monit Netw Des. 2008; 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6540-8_2

Chong FS, Tan DNK. Hydrogeological activities in Peninsular Malaysia and Sarawak. Bull Geol Soc Malaysia. 1986; 20(August):827-42. https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm20198638

Streltsova-Adams TD. Well Hydraulics in Heterogeneous Aquifer Formation. Adv Hydrosci. 1978; 11:357-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-021811-0.50011-5

Gringarten AC. Flow Test Evaluation of Fractured Reservoirs. Geol Soc Am. 1982; 237-63. https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE189-p237

Boulton N, Streltsova-Adams TD. Unsteady Flow to a Pumped Well in an Unconfined Fissured Aquifer. J Hydrol. 1978; 37:349-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(78)90026-4

Anon. Rock Fractures and Fluid Flow: Contemporary Understanding and Applications. Washington DC; 1996.

Renard P, Glenz D, Mejias M. Understanding diagnostic plots for well-test interpretation. Hydrogeol J. 2009; 17(3):589-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0392-0

Burton CK. Geology and Mineral Resources Johor Bahru-Kulai Area, South Johor. 1973.

Saleh MA, Ramli AT, Hamzah K bin, Alajerami Y, Moharib M, Saeed I. Prediction of terrestrial gamma dose rate based on geological formations and soil types in the Johor State, Malaysia. J Environ Radioact. 2015; 148:111-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.05.019

Kruseman GP, De Ridder NA, Verweij JM. Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data Second Edition (Completely Revised). 2000.

Puls RW, Barcelona MJ. Low-flow (minimal drawdown) ground-water sampling procedures. 1996.

Lerner DN, Teutsch G. Recommendations for level-determined sampling in wells. J Hydrol. 1995; 171(34):355-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)06016-C

McMillan LA, Rivett MO, Tellam JH, Dumble P, Sharp H. Influence of vertical flows in wells on groundwater sampling. J Contam Hydrol [Internet]. 2014; 169:50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.05.005

Theis CV. The Relation between the Lowering of the Piezometric Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Groundwater Storage. Trans Am Geophys Union. 1935; 518-24. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519