Privatization as the Source of Organizational Change in the Israeli Labor Federation (the Histadrut): an Israeli Case Study


Affiliations

  • Haifa University, Zefat Academic College, Research Kibbutz Institute, Israel

Abstract

The original Histadrut was founded as a welfare agency, as a socialist entity the Histadrut was politically and economically linked to the Labor Party which helped fund it while in government. The purpose of this research is to analyze how the process of privatization affected the goals of the Histadrut, as it evolved from being a super- organization dominating most of Israeli society to a mere confederation of labor unions. This research was conducted by case study analysis: using two methods of data collection - analyzing documents and interviews. The finding show, that Histadrut was highly politicized, and this led to the organization's incurring heavy debts. In 1994, a new leader, Haim Ramon, was elected and coped with its organizational decline. He transformed the Histadrut into a confederation of autonomous labor unions, selling off Histadrut enterprises and assets to private investors, and severing all political ties. The Histadrut underwent organizational change, downsizing and focusing on trade union goals.The main conclusion from this research is: The privatization process in the Israeli labor unions created a new organization focusing on its trade union's goals, losing its uniqueness as a society-wide entity.

Keywords

Goal Transformation, Union Leaders, Privatization, Trade Unions.

Subject Discipline

Economics

Full Text:

References

Admati, M. (2001). From the Old Histadrut to the New One. Tel Aviv: Histadrut Publications. (in Hebrew).

Akershtain, S., Zilberperb, B. Z., & Rozebitz, S. (1997). Privatization of firms in Israel and the world. Bar Ilan University: Ramat Gan. (in Hebrew).

Banciu, A. (2009). Institutional Reform in the European Union. Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 1(2), 139–143.

Barak, Erez, D. (2008). The public trail of privatization: models, norms and challenges. Law review, (30)3, 461– 515.

Bartal, G. (1989). The Histadrut: Structure and Activities. Tel Aviv: Histadrut Publications. (in Hebrew).

Behrens, M., Hamann, K., & Hurd. R. (2004). Conceptualizing Labour Union Revitalization. In C.

M. Frege & J. E. Kelly (Eds.), Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy (pp. 11–19). New York: Oxford University Press.

Bozeman, B. (2002). Public Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145–161.

Brendan, M. (2007). The world bank, railways privatization and trade unions. International Trade Union Cooperation, 4, 3–10.

Cornfield, D. B., & Mccammon, H. J. (2003). Revitalizing Labor: Global Perspectives and a Research Agenda. Research in the Sociology of Work, 11, 1–20.

Dabscheck, B. (2003). International Unionism’s Competitive Edge: FIFPro and the European Treaty. Industrial Relations, 58(1), 85–108.

Darlington, R. (2009). Leadership and Union Militancy: The Case of the RMT. Capital & Class, 99, 3–32.

Dolvik, J. E., & Waddington, J. (2004). Organizing Marketized Services: Are Trade Unions Up to the Job? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 25(1), 9–40.

Fishman, N., Prazmowska, A. J., & Heith, H. (2006). Communist Coalmining Union Activists and Postwar Reconstruction, 1945-52: Germany, Poland and Britain. Science & Society, 70(1), 74–97.

Forrant, R. (2002). The International Association of Machinists, Pratt & Whitney, and the Struggle for a BlueCollar Future in Connecticut. International Review of Social History, 47(S10), 113–136.

Greenberg, L. L. (1993). The Histadrut Above All. Jerusalem: Nevo Publishing. (in Hebrew).

Greenberg, Y. (2004). Anatomy of Crisis Foretold: The Collapse of Labor Owned Enterprises in the 80s. Tel Aviv: Am Oved. (in Hebrew).

Hayter, D. (2005). How the Right Made Labour Safe for Business. Manchester: Manchester university press.

Held, D., & McGrew, A. G. (2002). The Global Transformations Reader. Great Britain: Library of Congress.

Hevrat, Haovdim. (1990). The aim is participation and involvement in Hevrat Haovdim. Tel Aviv: Lavon Institution. (in Hebrew).

Histadrut. 1990. The Aim is Participation and Involvement in Hevrat Haovdim. Tel Aviv. (in Hebrew).

Histadrut. (1994). Minutes of the Histadrut 17th Convention. Tel Aviv: The New Histadrut. (in Hebrew).

Histadrut. (1995). Minutes of the Report of the Histadrut controller. Tel Aviv: Histadrut.

Histadrut. (2002). Minutes of Histadrut 19th Convention. Tel Aviv: The New Histadrut. (in Hebrew).

Horowitz, D., & Lisak, M. (1977). From pre-state to the State. Tel Aviv: Am Oved. (in Hebrew).

Humphrey, J. C. (2000). Self-organization and Trade Union Democracy. The Sociological Review, 48(2), 262–282.

Iranzo, C., & Patruyo, T. (2002). Trade Unionism and Globalization: Thoughts from Latin America. Current Sociology, 50(1), 57–74.

Kelly, J. (2005).Social Movement Theory and Union Revitalization in Britain. In S. Fernie and D. Metcalf (Eds.), Trade Unions: Resurgence or Demise? (pp. 62–82). London: Routledge.

Kiely, R. (2003). The Race to the Bottom and International Labor Solidarity. Review: A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center, 26(1), 67–88.

Kimmerling, B. (1995). Between State and Society: The Sociology of Politics. Tel Aviv: The Open University. (in Hebrew).

Latham, J. M. and Dizler, W. E. (2010). Collective Effort: The American Union and the American Public Library. Library Trends, 59(1-2), 237–255, 374–375.

Mangum, G. L., & Mangum, S. L. (1993). Assessing Alternative Employment – Relations Systems Mangum. Challenge, 36(4), 29–38.

McCartin, A. J., Compa, L., & Friedman, S. (2005). Democratizing the Demand for Workers’ Rights/A Response. Dissent, 52, 61–72.

Melling, J. (2004). Leading the White-Collar Union: Clive Jenkins, the Management of Trade-Union Officers, and the Politics of the British Labour Movement, c.19681979. International Review of Social History, 49, 71–102.

Miller, D. (2005). Regional Solidarity and a New Regional Movement in Post-apartheid Southern Africa: Retail Workers in Mozambique and Zambia: Labour, Capital, and Society. Labour, Capital and Society, 38(1/2), 94–125.

Pamacheche, F., & Koma, B. (2007). Privatization in SubSaharan Africa - an essential route to poverty alleviation. African Integration Review volume, 1, 1–22.

Pierce, M. (2000). The Populist President of the American Federation of Labor: The Career of John McBride, 18801895. Labor History, 41, 5–24.

Rainnie, A. (2006). The Future of Worker Representation.Capital & Class, 30(2), 169–174.

Ramon, H. (1994–5). Minutes of Histadrut chairman’s report, The Elected Representatives of the Histadrut, July 1994–November 1995, p. 3. (in Hebrew).

Ramon, H. (1995). The Histadrut – The Sinking Titanic. Histadrut, Unpublished internal document. (in Hebrew).

Rao, B. S. (2004). New Social Forces in India. Foreign Affairs, 23(4), 635–643.

Reinhart, T. (1999). How the Histadrut was destroyed. Mit’an, 10, 1–3. (in Hebrew).

Shapiro, Y. (1977). Israeli Democracy. Ramat-Gan, Israel: Massada. (in Hebrew).

Shostak, B. A. (2006). Finding Meaning in Labor’s Perfect Storm: Lesson from the 1981 PATCO Strike. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18(3), 223–229.

Shvarts, S. (2002). The Workers’ Health Fund in Eretz Israel: Kupat Holim, 1911-1937. New York: The University of Rochester.

Shvarts, S. (2008). Health and Zionism. New York: The University of Rochester.

Simms, M. (2007). Interest Formation in Greenfield Union Organizing Campaigns. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(5), 439–454.

Spronk, S. (2009). Water privatization and the prospects for trade union revitalization in the public sector: case studies from Bolivia and Peru. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, 14, 164–176.

Stirling, J. (2005). There’s a New World Somewhere: The Rediscovery of Trade Unionism. Capital & Class, 29(3), 43–63.

Weil, D. (2005). A Strategic Choice Framework for Union Decision Making. Working USA, 8(3), 327–347.

Western, B. (1995). A Comparative Study of Working-Class Disorganization: Union Decline in Eighteen Advanced Capitalist Countries. American Sociological Review, 60(2), 179–201.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.