Indigenous bacterial endophytic PGPMs of chickpea: Characterization and hidden antagonistic potential against Rhizoctonia bataticola causing dry root rot of chickpea

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur – 584104, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur – 584104, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur – 584104, Karnataka ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2022/32473

Keywords:

Bacillus cereus, B. pacificus, B. subtilis, B. tropicus, chickpea, dry root rot

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is grown in more than 50 countries. India is the largest chickpea-producing country accounting for 64% of the global chickpea production. However, the production is contrained by the dry root rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola. Considering this problem, the investigation was carried out to isolate, characterize and the antagonistic potential of indigenous endophytic PGPMs for one of the components in the integrated management of dry root rot of chickpeas in eco-friendly manner. Hence, the isolation of thirty endophytic PGPMs was carried from chickpea by using the spread plate technique. The cultural characters and Gram’s staining reaction confirmed that the endophytic PGPMs isolated from chickpea plant tissues were bacteria. Among thirty bacterial strains, eight showed more than 50% of mycelial inhibition of the pathogen. Out of eight strains, five highly superior strains were selected and subjected for 16S rDNA gene sequencing using the universal primers (16Sr DNA F and 16Sr DNA R), which produced amplified products of size 1500 bp. nBLAST results of 16S rDNA gene sequence revealed that all the endophytic bacterial PGPMs showed homology with genus Bacillus but with different species. The five potential strains namely, BEPGPM-5, BEPGPM-9, BEPGPM-27, BEPGPM-28, and BEPGPM-30 were identified and confirmed as B. tropicus, B. pacificus, B. cereus, B. subtilis, respectively, based on molecular technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-08-08

How to Cite

Sunkad, G., Patil, M. S., & Joshi, R. (2023). Indigenous bacterial endophytic PGPMs of chickpea: Characterization and hidden antagonistic potential against <i>Rhizoctonia bataticola</i> causing dry root rot of chickpea. Journal of Biological Control, 36(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2022/32473

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Received 2023-01-19
Accepted 2023-05-25
Published 2023-08-08

 

References

Bhavani D, Anday M, and Kumar K. 2015. Chickpea endophytic bacteria inhibiting dry root rot fungus Rhizoctonia bataticola. Int. J Sci Eng Res, 6(2): 83–85.

Chiranjeevi N, Kumar MR, Padmodaya B, Venkateswarlu NC, Sudhakar P, Jayalakshmi Devi RS, and Jyothsna MK. 2020. In vitro evaluation of endophytic bacteria for their efficacy against chickpea dry root rot causing pathogen (Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci, 9(12): 2028–2043. https://doi. org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.240

Etesami H. 2020. Plant microbe interactions in plants and stress tolerance. Elsevier. 102–112. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818204-8.00018-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818204-8.00018-7

Hadimani B. 2018. Studies on isolation of endophytes and their efficacy against soil borne fungal pathogens in tomato. PhD, Thesis. Univ. Agic. Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka (India).

Khan RA, Bhat TA and Kumar K. 2013. Screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm lines against dry root rot caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola (taub.) Butler. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 6: 211–212.

Lopes MJS, Dias-Filho MB and Gurgel ESC. 2021. Successful plant growth-promoting microbes: Inoculation methods and abiotic factors. Front Sustain Food Syst., 5: 200– 216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.606454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.606454

Mitra D, Anđelkovic S, Panneerselvam P, Manisha SA, Vasic T, Ganeshamurthy AN, Verma D, Poonam Radha TK and Divya J. 2019. Plant Growth Promoting Microorganisms (PGPMs) helping in sustainable agriculture: Current perspective. Int J Agril Sci Vet Med., S(2): 50–74.

Salo EN and Novero A. 2021. Identification and characterisation of endophytic bacteria from coconut (Cocos nucifera) tissue culture. Tropical Life Sci Res., 31(1): 57–68. PMid: 32963711 PMCid: PMC7485530. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2020.31.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2020.31.1.4

Schaad NW. 1992. Xanthomonas. In: Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria, II Ed. International Book Distributing Co. Lucknow. p. 165.

Sharma M and Pande S. 2013. Unravelling effects of temperature and soil moisture stress response on development of dry root rot [Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.)] Butler in chickpea. American J Plant Sci., 4: 584–589. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.43076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.43076

Vincent JM. 1947. Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nat. 150: 850. PMid: 20343980. https://doi.org/10.1038/159850b0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/159850b0

Xu SJ and Kim BS. 2014.Biocontrol of Fusarium crown and root rot and promotion of growth of tomato by Paenibacillus strains isolated from soil. Mycobiol., 42: 158–166. PMid: 25071385 PMCid: PMC4112232. https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2014.42.2.158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2014.42.2.158