Comparison of Chemistry and Zebrafish Toxicological Profile of Extract Processed as Per Traditional Method and of its Fraction for Similarity/Dissimilarity – A Case Study of Terminalia chebula Fruit
Keywords:Similarity, Terminalia chebula, FET, HoSU, PCA
History of safe use, HoSU preparations are formulations mentioned in ancient literature and are according to the Ayurvedic system of medicine. Due to the advent of new technologies, there is a shift in the manufacturing methodologies of Ayurvedic medicines involving extractions and fractionations. This shift, while has helped manufacturers improve their productivity, raises a question on the equivalence to chemistry, and toxicity when compared to traditional products. As a case study, an attempt is made to establish equivalence between HoSU preparation of Terminalia chebula with commercially available aqueous and alcoholic extracts and one of its fractions. Chemical analysis of the products using principal component analysis, revealed similar chemistry whereas the LC50 values of HoSU preparation were safest followed by commercial preparations and the reference marker compound when tested on zebrafish. The generated data indicated that chemical composition of all 4 samples tested were similar qualitatively, though variations were observed quantitatively. PCA plot indicated that the HoSU extract, commercial alcoholic extract, and commercial water extract were similar whereas water acetone extract was dissimilar. This emphasizes the need for conducting an equivalence study in terms of chemistry and toxicity between HoSU products and commercially available products.
How to Cite
Ballabh B, Chaurasia OP. Traditional medicinal plants of cold desert Ladakh-used in treatment of cold, cough and fever. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007; 112(2):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.03.020. PMid:17459623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.03.020
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and Rules 1945. New Delhi: National Informatics Centre [Internet]. [Cited Dec 21 2021]. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ handle/123456789/2409?sam_handle=123456789/1362
e- Aushadhi portal. New Delhi: Drug Control Cell, Ministry of Ayush, Government of India [Internet]. [Cited Dec 21 2021]. https://e-aushadhi.gov.in/. [assessed 21 December 2021].
Goraya GS, Ved DK. Medicinal Plants in India: An Assessment of their Demand and Supply. New Delhi: National Medicinal Plants Board, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India and Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education; 2017.
Ministry of Ayush, Government of India. Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India. Vol 1 Part 1. Ghaziabad: Pharmacopoeia Commission for Indian Medicine and Homoeopathy; 1986.
United States Pharmacopeia. Dietary Supplement Monographs, Terminalia Chebula Fruit Dry Extract. USP-NF. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeia; 2020 https://doi.org/10.31003/USPNF_M11377_02_01. PMid:32422596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31003/USPNF_M11377_02_01
Narayana DBA, Mundkinajeddu D, Singh VK, Koshy R, Murali B. A perspective on additional approaches beyond organic marker compounds while developing analytical monographs for botanicals. J AOAC Int. 2019; 102(4):979–985. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-0377. PMid:30558696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-0377
Mizgirev IV, Revskoy S. A new zebrafish model for experimental leukemia therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010; 9:895–902. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.9.11.11667. PMid:20339318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.9.11.11667
Narayana DBA, Singh VK, Koshy R, Murali B. An approach to determining similarities/dissimilarities of processed botanicals. Cutting Edge. 2018; 7(9):9–14.
British Pharmacopoeia Commission. British Pharmacopoeia (Volume V-A369). London: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; 2020.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD TG 236 test guidelines for testing of chemicals. Fish embryos acute toxicity (FET) test; 2013.
Finney DJ, Tattersfield F. Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1952
Bliss CI. The calculation of the dosage mortality curve. Ann Appl Biol. 1935; 22:134–67 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1935.tb07713.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1935.tb07713.x
Singh A, Zahra K. LC50 assessment of cypermethrin in Heteropneustesfossilis: Probit analysis. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 2017; 5:126–30.
Metsalu T, Vilo J. Clustvis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heat map. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(W1):W566–W570. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv468. PMid:25969447. PMCid:PMC4489295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv468