A Customized Impression Technique for Highly Placed Mal-Aligned Implant for a Hybrid Over Denture Patient: A Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2020/24861Keywords:
Customized Impression Tray, Elastic chain, Mal-placed implants, Ney's SurveyorAbstract
A hybrid implant denture is a fixed prosthesis over a metal framework and engaged by screws into the implant abutments. The anterior and posterior part of a mandibular hybrid denture is rigid on implants. Implant supported hybrid prosthesis provide satisfactory results on the mastication, esthetics and phonetics. This article describes a customized impression technique for highly mal aligned placed implants for hybrid implant denture. The total of five implants was present in the mandibular arch. Author advocates surveying of mal aligned implant analogue cast. The current technique depicts a customized resin impression tray with open border at two sites that concomitant at highly mal aligned implant position (canine region). Technique also uses the hard elastic chain for splinting of impression analogue. Final impression is recorded with single putty wash technique with polyvinyl siloxane elastomeric material. Although, technique is quite clinical sensitive. Asserting over this technique, it eliminates the use of transmucosal or multi unit abutments. This advocated technique is also economical for both clinician and patient. Impression was quite satisfactory.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).
References
Chai JY, Jameson LM, Moser JB, Hesby RA. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: part 2. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66: 287–292. https://doi .org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90251-Q
Pande NA, Parkhedkar RD. An evaluation of dimensional accuracy of one-step and two-step impression technique using addition silicone impression material: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013; 13: 254–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0182-1
Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ. Accuracy of newly formulated fastsetting elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 530–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.007
Kumari N, Nandeeshwar DB. The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression techniques: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015; 15: 211–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.158074
Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ. Accuracy of newly formulated fastsetting elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 530–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.007
Kumari N, Nandeeshwar DB. The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression techniques: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015; 15: 211–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.158074
Mahesh Lahori, Mahesh Lanka, Rahul Nagrath, Shweta Singh. An evaluation of the accuracy of multiple implant impression technique: An in vitro study. The Journal of implants and Advanced Clinical Dentistry 2012; 4: 57–69.
Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 216–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-19960054000028
N.A.Tarib, T W Seong, KM Chuen,MS Khan. Evaluation of Splinting implant impression Techniques: Two Dimensional Analyses: Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2012; 20: 35–39.
Misch CE. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. Contemporary Implant Dentistry; p. 99. p. 100.
Thalji G, Bryington M, De Kok IJ, Cooper LF. Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58: 207–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.007
Yao, C., Lu, J., & Webster, T. J. Titanium and cobalt– chromium alloys for hips and knees. Biomaterials for Artificial Organs, 2011; pp. 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1533/ 9780857090843.1.34