Hemisection: Resection for Conservation – A Case Report

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Unais Moulana
     Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai ,IN
  • Babu Vasanthi
     Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai ,IN
  • Dasarathan Duraivel
     Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai ,IN
  • Cruz Nishanthini
     Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai ,IN
  • Saravanan Poorni
     Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai ,IN
  • Manali Ramakrishnan Srinivasan
     Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai ,IN

Keywords:

Hemisection, Mandibualr molar, Root resection
Endodontics

Abstract

This case report presents hemisection as a treatment option to save the extensively affected molars thereby preventing the undesirable consequences of tooth loss. Hemisection means the division of mandibular molar into two halves followed by removal of the diseased root with its accompanying crown portion. Careful case selection is necessary for long-term success.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-09

How to Cite

Moulana, U., Vasanthi, B., Duraivel, D., Nishanthini, C., Poorni, S., & Srinivasan, M. R. (2018). Hemisection: Resection for Conservation – A Case Report. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 30(2), 56–60. Retrieved from https://www.informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jpfa/article/view/21091

Issue

Volume 30, Issue 2, June 2016

Section

Case Report

License

All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

 

References

Buhler H. Survival rates of hemisected teeth: an attempt to compare them with survival rates of alloplastic implants. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 1994;14(6):536–543.

Parmar G, Vashi P. Hemisection: a case-report and review. Endodontology. 2003;15:26–29.

Jain A, Bahuguna R, Agarwal V. Hemisection as an alternative treatment for resorbed multirooted tooth – a case report. Asian J Oral Health Allied Sci. 2011;1 (1):44–46.

Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 4th ed. St Loius: Mosby; 1987:568.

Kurtzman GM, Silverstein LH, Shatz PC. Hemisection as an alternative treatment for vertically fractured mandibular molars. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2006;27 (2):126–129.

Nowakowski AT, Serebnitski A, Pesun IJ. Hemisection as a treatment option: a case report. Oral Health. 2010;100(3): 83–89.

Park JB. Hemisection of teeth with questionable prognosis. Report of a case with seven-year results. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2009;11:214–219.

Saad MN, Moreno J, Crawford C. Hemisection as an alternative treatment for decayed multirooted terminal abutment: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009;75: 387–390.

Shafiq MK. Hemisection: an option to treat apically fractured & dislodged part of a mesial root of a molar. JPDA. 2011;20 (3):183–186.

Carnevale G, Gianfranco D, Tonelli M, Marin C, Fuzzi M. A retrospective analysis of the periodontal prosthetic treatment of molars with interradicular lesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1991;11:189–205.

Basten CH., Ammons WF, Persson R. Long-term evaluation of root-resected molars: a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996;16:207–219.

Erpenstein H. A 3-year study of hemisectioned molars. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10:1–10.

Newell DH. The diagnosis and treatment of molar furcation invasions. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:301–337.

Schmitt MS, Brown HF. The hemisected mandibular molar. A strategic abutment. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58(2):140–144.