A comparative study of biodiesel production by microwave assisted and conventional transesterification methods

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • ,IN
  • ,IN
  • ,IN
  • ,IN
  • ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2021/30116

Keywords:

Biodiesel, non-edible oil, microwave assisted transesterification, pressure reactor, oxidation stability.

Abstract

Nowaday’s use of biofuels for both power generation and automobiles is more relevant because of the need for energy security, environmental concerns, foreign exchange savings and socio-economic issues. Non-edible oils are considered as second generation alternative fuels and use of these oils avoids conflict between food and energy security. Therefore various locally available vegetable oils of edible and nonedible nature were selected for their biodiesel production. Subsequent characterization of these biodiesels was carried out to ensure their suitability as alternative fuels in diesel engines. Subsequently characterization of both raw vegetable oils and their respective biodiesels was done according to ASTM standards. The experimental investigation also suggests that the fuel processing with conventional transesterification method is a laborious and time consuming one. On the other hand microwave assisted transesterification (MATM) is found to be better in terms of shorter reaction time, lower consumption of power and resources compared to conventional transesterification process. MATM method reduces the reaction time drastically for both edible and non-edible oils. For edible oils the reaction time is found to be 1 minute while for nonedible oils it varies from 3 to 6 minutes. The biodiesel production from pressure reactor uses same resources required by the conventional transesterification method [CTM], but it is conducted in a closed vessel. This feature enhances the chemical kinetics, thereby reducing the reaction time up to 66% compared to conventional method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-04-28

How to Cite

Y H, B., H, T., S.P, D., R, V., & Banapurmath, R. (2022). A comparative study of biodiesel production by microwave assisted and conventional transesterification methods. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 69(12A), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2021/30116
Received 2022-04-28
Accepted 2022-04-28
Published 2022-04-28

 

References

http://www.niir.org/projects/projects/renewableenergynon-conventional-energy-solar-energybiofuelb iomass/z, 52, 0, 64/index.html.

Sukumar Puhan, N. saravanan, G. Nagarajan, N. Vedaraman, “Effect of Biodiesel Unsaturated Fatty Acid on Combustion Characteristics of a DI Compression Ignition Engine”, Biomass and Bioenergy, 34, 2010, 1079-1088.

Murugesan. A., Umarani C., Subramanian R., Nedunchezhian N., (2009): “Bio-diesel as an alternative fuel for diesel engines— A Review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 3, 653662.

V. S. Yaliwal, S.R. Daboji, N.R. Banapurmath, P.G. Tewari, (2010): “Production and Utilization of Renewable Liquid Fuel in a Single Cylinder Four Stroke Direct Injection Compression Ignition Engine”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2 (10), 5088- 5099.

Rajput R.K., (2006): “Thermal Engineering”, Laxmi Publications, New Delhi, India edition, 1567-1596.

Pramanik, K., (2003): Properties and use of jatropha curcas oil and diesel fuel blends in compression ignition engine. Renewable Energy, 28, 239-248.

Vellguth, G., (1983): Performance of vegetable oils and their monoesters as fuels for diesel engines. Society of Automotive Engineers. Paper No.831358,

Srivastava, A. and Prasad, R., (2000): Triglyceridesbased diesel fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4, 111–33.

K. Yamane, A. Ueta, Y. Shimamoto. (2001): “Influence of physical and chemical properties of biodiesel fuels on injection, combustion and exhaust emission chariectersties in a direct injection compression ignition engine.” International Journal of engine research. 2, No4 IMech E, JER 02801, 249-262.

S Ramadhas, S. Jayaraj, C. Muraleedharan, (2004): “Use of Vegetable Oils as I.C engine Fuels : A Review”, Renewable Energy, 29, 727-742.

B.K. Barnwal, M.P. Sharma, (2004): “Prospects of biodiesel production from vegetable oils India,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol.9 , 2005, 363-378.

D. Agarwal, L. Kumar, A.K. Agarwal, (2007): “Performance Evaluation of a Vegetable oil fuelled CI Engine”. Renewable Energy.

R. Sarin, M. Sharma, (2007): “Jatropha Palm biodiesel blends: An optimum mix for Asia”, FUEL, Vol. 86, 2007, 1365-71.

Rushang M. Joshi, Michel J. Pegg, (2007): “Flow Properties of Biodiesel Fuel Blends at Low Temperature”, Fuel, 86, 143-151.

Hosmani K. M., Hiremath V.B., Keri R.S., (2009): “Renewable Energy Sources from Michelia Champaca and Garcinia Indica Seed Oil – A Rich Source of Oil”, Biomass and Bioenergy, Volume 22, 267-270.

Srivastava A, Prasad R., (2000): “Triglycerides-Based Diesel Fuels”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4, 111–33.

Vellguth G., (1983): “Performance of Vegetable Oils and Their Monoesters as Fuels for Diesel Engines”. SAE paper no. 831358.

Alessandro Schondorn; Nicos Ladommato S.; Jogn Willians; Robert Allan; John Reogerson (2009): The Influence of Moleculer Structure of Fatty acid Monoalkyl Esters on Diesel Combustion, Combustion and Flame, Volume 157157, 1396 -1412.

N.R. Banapurmath, P.G. Tewari, R.S. Hosmath, (2008): “Performance and Emission Characteristics of a DI Compression Ignition Engine Operated on Honge, Jatropha and Sesame Oil Methyl Esters”, Renewable Energy, 33, 1982–1988.

Y.C. Sharma, B. Singh, S.N. Upadhyay. (2008): “Advancements in development and characterization

of biodiesel: A review”. Journal of Fuel, Volume 87, Issue 12, 2355-2373.

A. Demirbas, (2005): “Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oils via Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Supercritical Methanol Transesterification Methods”, Journal of Prog. Energy Combustion Science, 31, 46–487.

A.A. Refaat, “Different Techniques for the Production of Biodiesel from Waste Vegetable Oil”, International Journal of Environmental Science and technology, 7 (1) 183-213.