Effect of Processing on Phytic Phosphorus Content in Maize

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Sardar Vallabhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, U.P. ,IN
  • Sardar Vallabhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, U.P. ,IN
  • Sardar Vallabhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, U.P. ,IN
  • Sardar Vallabhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, U.P. ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2016.53.1.3878

Keywords:

Phytic Phosphorus, Lime Treatment, Maize, Anti-Nutritional Factor, Processing, Cultivar.

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine the effect of processing on phytic phosphorus content in maize. An analytical comparison of effect of different methods of processing for reducing phytic phosphorus was carried out on maize. The maize is a staple crop and many rely on it as a primary source of nutrition. Though phytic phosphorus content makes minerals unavailable for absorption yet is used by majority of population. Six cultivars of maize namely VL-16, VL-41, VL-42, D741, D823 and D771 were processed to observe the reduction in phytic phosphorus content. Phytic phosphorus content of the different maize varieties ranged from 143.5 to 167.9 mg/100 g. Variety VL 41 showed highest phytic phosphorus content of 167.9 mg/100 g. Lime treatment was observed to cause significant reduction in phytic acid. Boiling and lime treatment reduced phytic phosphorus by 24.84 and 33.60 % respectively. Variety D771 of maize showed highest reduction of 108.9 mg/100 g after heat treatment and 89.8 mg/100 g after lime treatment. The total reduction in phytic phosphorus was 33.60%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2016-03-01

How to Cite

Pant, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, R., & Singh, M. (2016). Effect of Processing on Phytic Phosphorus Content in Maize. The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 53(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2016.53.1.3878

 

References

Maize Outlook Report, 2009. Karvy Comtrade Ltd., 2-8.

Pawar, V.D. and Iqbal, V.M., Production of quick cooking moth bean : phytic phosphorus and minerals, Ind. J. Nutr. Diet., 1987, 24, 142-145.

Jan, L., Hussain, T., Iqbal, P. and Sattar, A., Phytic acid and potential nutrients in wheat, corn and soybean, Pak. J. Sci. Indust. Res., 1985, 28, 331-332.

Donald, O., Phytate content in cereal and legumes, J. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., 1983, 28, 331-333.

Awada, H.S., Abedel Hady, Amro B. Hassan, M. Isam Ali and Elfadil E. Babiker, Antinutritional factor content and availability of protein, starch and mineral of maize (Zeamays linnaus) and lentil (Lens culinaris) as influenced by domestic processing, J. Fd. Technol., 2005, 3, 523-528.

Lorenz, Aron, Paul Scott, J.M. and Kendell R. Lamkey., Quantitative determination of phytate and organic phosphorus for maize breeding, Crop Sci. J., 2007, 47, 600-606.

Reboy, V. Seed for better future: ‘low phytate' grains to help overcome malnutrition and reduce pollution, Trends Plant Sci., 2001, 6, 458-462.

Cromwell, G. and Coffey, R.D. Phosphrus: A key essential nutrient, yet a possible major pollutant. Its control role in animal nutrition, 1991, 135-145, In T.P. Lyons (ed) Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. All Tech. Public Nicholasville, KY.

Hotz, Christine and Gibson, Rosaland S. Assessment of home based processing methods to reduce the phytate content and phytate/zinc molar ratio of white maize (Zea mays), J. Agric. Fd. Chem., 2001, 49, 692-698.

Hotz, et al., A home based method to reduce phytate content and increase zinc availability in maize based complimentary diet, Intern. J. Fd. Sci. Nutr., 2001, 52, 133-142.

Kent–Zones, D. and Amos, A.S., 6th edition. Modern Cereal Chemistry; Food Trade Press Ltd. London, 1967, 572-573.