Penile Fracture: Presentation, Management and Erectile Function Following Surgical Repair
Objective: To evaluate the clinical presentation, therapeutic options and outcome of the treatment of penile fracture.
Materials and Methods: We evaluated the results of 11 patients of penile fracture. All patients underwent immediate exploration and primary repair of the tear in tunica albuginea. Degree of Erectile dysfunction was assessed by IIEF-5.
Results: Eleven patients with median age of 35.1 years (range, 19-54 years) presented with fracture of the penis. Patient history and clinical examination were highly sensitive and accurate in predicting a tunical tear. The mode of injury was vigorous sexual intercourse in 4(36.4%) cases, self inflicted in 3(27.1%) cases, accidental trauma to erect penis in 3(27.1%) cases and rolling over in bed in 1(9.1%) case. The median time from injury to presentation was 10 hours (range 4-360 hours). Associated urethral injury was seen in 2(18.2%) cases. The mean hospital stay was 3 days. 7(87.5%) out of 8 patients available for follow-up reported, achieving adequate erection for intercourse without erectile or voiding dysfunction. The patient who presented late at 15 days had significant erectile dysfunction.
Conclusion: History and clinical examination are sufficient to diagnose fracture penis further evaluation is not necessary in most cases for managing patients with suspected penile fracture. Early surgical repair is associated with a good outcome with preservation of both sexual and voiding functions.
Orvis BR, McAninch JW. Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16:369-75.
Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 2002; 89:555â€“65.
Asgari MA, Hosseini SY, Safarinejad MR, Samadzadeh B, Bardideh AR. Penile fractures: evaluation, therapeutic approaches and long-term results. J Urol 1996 Jan; 155(1):148-9.
El-Assmy A, el-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, Ibrahiem el-HI. Does timing of presentation of penile fracture affect outcome of surgical intervention? Urology 2011 Jun; 77(6):1388-91.
El-Assmy A, El-Tholoth HS, Abou-ElGhar ME, Mohsen T, Ibrahiem EH. Risk factors of erectile dysfunction and penile vascular changes after surgical repair of penile fracture Int J Impot Res 2012 Jan-Feb; 24(1):20-5.
Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment Br J Urol Int 2002; 89:890â€“5.
Kalash SS, Young JD Jr. Fracture of penis: controversy of surgical versus conservative treatment. Urology 1984; 24:21-5.
El Atat R, Sfaxi M, Benslama MR, Amine D, Ayed M, Mouelli SB, et al. Fracture of the penis: management and long-term results of surgical treatment. Experience in 300 cases. J Trauma 2008 Jan; 64(1):121-5.
Ibrahiem el-HI, el-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, Hekal IA, el-Assmy A. Penile fracture: long-term outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Urology 2010 Jan; 75(1):108-11.
Agarwal MM, Singh SK, Sharma DK, Ranjan P, Kumar S, Chandramohan V, et al. Fracture of the penis: a radiological or clinical diagnosis? A case series and literature review. Can J Urol 2009 Apr; 16(2):4568-75.
Ghilan AM, Al-Asbahi WA, Ghafour MA, Alwan MA, Al-Khanbashi OM Management of penile fractures.Saudi Med J 2008 Oct; 29(10):1443-7.
Aman Z, Qayyum A, Khan M, Afridi V. Early surgical intervention in penile fracture. JPGMI 2004; 18(3):432-8.
Beysel M, Tekin A, Gurdal M. Evaluation and treatment of penile fractures: accuracy of clinical diagnosis and the value of corpus cavernosography. Urology 2002; 60:492â€“6.
- There are currently no refbacks.