Self Reporting Method in Business Surveys


  • Department of Statistics, Bangalore University, Bangalore


Dual Frame Sampling, Self Reporting, Telephone Cluster Sampling, Web Based Design.


This article reviews the role of self reporting (SR), by survey respondents in business research, given the now widely spread web and online facility with readily accessible panels. In this context, it outlines (a) the effects of response format (b) uses of SR information (c) dropout pattern on the web, together with affecting factors and (d) dual frame sampling for rare groups. Relevant empirical evidences, wherever necessary, are cited.


Blair E. and Blari, J (2006), Dual Frame web-telephone sampling for rare groups. Journal of official statistics, 22(2), 211-220.

Buse Meyer J. R. and Townsend, J. T. (1993). A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological review, 100, 432-459.

Galesic M (2006). Dropouts on Web: Effects of interest and burden experienced during an online survey, Journal of official statistics 22(2), 313-328.

Kalton G (2001). Practical methods for sampling rare and mobile populations. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, section on Survey Research Methods, August.

Lee E., Hu, M. Y. and Toh, R. S. (2000). Are consumer survey results distorted? Systematic Impact of Behavioural Frequency and Duration on Survey Response Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 125-133.

Thomas R. K., Behke,S., Smith R. and Lafond, R. (2003). It's only incidental: Effects of Response Format in determining incidence. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, TN.

Thomas R. K. and Klein, J. D. (2006). Journal of Official Statistics 22(2), 221-244.




How to Cite

Srivenkataramana, T. (2007). Self Reporting Method in Business Surveys. DHARANA - Bhavan’s International Journal of Business, 1(1), 38–40. Retrieved from



Research Articles