Disadvantages of using Traditional, Interactive and Distance Learning Methods when Studying the Specialty "Pharmacy"


Affiliations

  • The Far Eastern State Medical University, Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Professor of the Department Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Khabarovsk, 680000, Russian Federation

Abstract

Interactive and remote technologies are being actively introduced into the training process in the specialty “Pharmacy.” In addition to ease of use, they have several advantages and disadvantages for all stakeholders. The purpose of the work is to analyze the disadvantages of traditional, interactive, and remote methods of teaching in the specialty “Pharmacy” at the Far Eastern State Medical University. This is a sociological survey of students of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Biomedicine (higher education), as well as the Medical-Pharmaceutical College (secondary education). Statistical processing was performed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Traditional teaching methods are characterized by the inconvenience of tight time frames. During on-line classes, it is more difficult to use an individual methodology for the student and change the teaching method. The most characteristic shortcomings of distance learning include the lack of motivation and the possibility of violations (writing off, forgery, etc.) by the student. Despite the geographical remoteness of the regions, material, and technical difficulties in switching to distance learning, as a rule, did not arise. The lack of an individual approach and the subjectivity of student assessments in distance and traditional teaching methods are due to the high occupancy of groups and their frequent combination (10-25 people) during the class. The disadvantage of remote methods is the complexity of regular control by the teacher, the lack of secure personality identification systems when sending written works and testing on-line, and the low level of consciousness of future specialists. According to the results of the questionnaire, the least number of shortcomings have interactive teaching methods, implying the active participation of the student himself and an individual approach.


Keywords

Education, Interactive Classes, Pharmacy, Remote Technologies, Traditional Training

Full Text:

References

Paudyal V, Cadogan C, Fialová D, Henman MC, Hazen A, Okuyan B, Lutters M, Stewart D. Provision of clinical pharmacy services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of pharmacists from 16 European countries. Res Social Adm Pharm, 2020 Nov 30; S1551-7411(20)31202-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.017.

Jordan D, Guiu-Segura JM, Sousa-Pinto G, Wang LN. How COVID-19 has impacted the role of pharmacists around the world. Farm Hosp, 2021 Feb 22; 45(2):89-95. https://doi.org/10.7399/fh.11652.

Cardiff LM, Lum EP, Mitchell C, Nissen LM, Patounas MP, McBride LJ. Teaching the principles of safe prescribing to a mixed profession postgraduate cohort: Program development. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2018 Oct 30; 11:635-644. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S169424.

Baldoni S, Amenta F, Ricci G. Telepharmacy services: Present status and future perspectives: A review. Medicina (Kaunas), 2019 Jul 1; 55(7):327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ medicina55070327

Morillo-Verdugo R, Margusino-Framiñán L, Monte-Boquet E, Morell-Baladrón A, Barreda-Hernández D, Rey-Piñeiro XM, Negro-Vega E, Delgado-Sánchez O. Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy Position Statement on Telepharmacy: Recommendations for its implementation and development. Farm Hosp, 2020 Jul 1; 44(4):174-181. https://doi.org/ 10.7399/fh.11515.

Shah TK, Tariq T, Phillips R, Davison S, Hoare A, Hasan SS, Babar ZU. Health care for all: effective, community supported, healthcare with innovative use of telemedicine technology. J Pharm Policy Pract., 2018 Feb 1; 11:3. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0130-5.

Alqurshi A. Investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on pharmaceutical education in Saudi Arabia - A call for a remote teaching contingency strategy. Saudi Pharm J, 2020 Sep; 28(9):1075-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.07.008.

Al-Taweel D, Al-Haqan A, Bajis D, Al-Bader J, Al-Taweel AM, Al-Awadhi A, Al-Awadhi F. Multidisciplinary academic perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Health Plann Manage, 2020 Nov; 35(6):1295-1301. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3032.

Akour A, Al-Tammemi AB, Barakat M, Kanj R, Fakhouri HN, Malkawi A, Musleh G. The impact of the COVID 19 pandemic and emergency distance teaching on the Psychological Status of University Teachers: A cross-sectional study in Jordan. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2020 Dec; 103(6):2391-2399. Epub 2020 Oct 27. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0877.

Elsalem L, Al-Azzam N, Jum’ah AA, Obeidat N. Remote E-exams during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of students’ preferences and academic dishonesty in faculties of medical sciences. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2021 Feb; 62:326-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.054.

Scott A, Dawson RM, Mitchell S, Catledge C. Simulationbased interprofessional education in a rural setting: The development and evaluation of a Remote-In telehealth scenario. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2020 May/Jun; 41(3):187-189. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000461.

Ohta K, Kurosawa H, Shiima Y, Ikeyama T, Scott J, Hayes S, Gould M, Buchanan N, Nadkarni V, Nishisaki A. The effectiveness of remote facilitation in simulation-based pediatric resuscitation training for medical students. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2017 Aug; 33(8):564-569. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000752.

Koval PG, Kim JJ, Makhlouf T. Pharmacist perception of a mobile application audience response system for remote pharmacy continuing education participants. J Pharm Pract, 2020 Apr; 33(2):153-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190018792391.

Savage A, Minshew LM, Anksorus HN, McLaughlin JE. Remote OSCE experience: What first year pharmacy students liked, learned, and suggested for future implementations. Pharmacy (Basel), 2021 Mar 18; 9(1):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010062

Scoular S, Huntsberry A, Patel T, Wettergreen S, Brunner JM. Transitioning competency-based communication

assessments to the online platform: Examples and student outcomes. Pharmacy (Basel), 2021 Mar 5; 9(1):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010052.

Reynolds PM, Rhein E, Nuffer M, Gleason SE. Educational methods and technological innovations for introductory experiential learning given the contact-related limitations imposed by the SARS-CoV2/COVID-19 pandemic. Pharmacy (Basel), 2021 Feb 25; 9(1):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010047.

Pratap A, Neto EC, Snyder P, Stepnowsky C, Elhadad N, Grant D, Mohebbi MH, Mooney S, Suver C, Wilbanks J, Mangravite L, Heagerty PJ, Areán P, Omberg L. Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: A cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants. NPJ Digit Med, 2020 Feb 17; 3:21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0224-8.

Schlesselman LS. Perspective from a teaching and learning center during emergency remote teaching. Am J Pharm Educ, 2020 Aug; 84(8): ajpe8142. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8142.

Louiselle K, Elson EC, Oschman A, Duehlmeyer S. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pharmacy learners and preceptors. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2020 Jul 7; 77(14):1097-1099. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa127.

Population density of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation as of January 1, 2019. Federal State Statistics Service. Access on: April 16, 2021. https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781. [Plotnost™ naseleniyasub ektov Rossijskoj Federaciina 1 yanvarya 2019 g. Federalnayasluzhbagosudarstvennojstatistiki/Rezhimdostupa:https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781 (data obrashcheniya 16.04.2021) in Russ].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.