Influence of Conventional Therapy in Post Natal Women with Back Pain

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • HOD/Associate Professor, Krishna College of Physiotherapy, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University, Karad – 415539, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Professor, Department of OBG & Gynecology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University, Karad – 415539, Maharashtra ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2022/30769

Keywords:

Post Natal, Back Pain, Conventional Training, Physiotherapy

Abstract

Background: Post-partum period brings joy as well as pain for women. It is period after delivery till 42 days. In most of women, problems like leg pain, back pain, floppiness of abdominal muscles, edema and extremities, spinal problems, problems in breast feeding arise. Postnatal back pain including lumbosacral region, pelvic girdle and sacroiliac pain is very common presentation. Evidences show that post natal low back pain is very common. Various studies show that in first year after delivery it ranges from 21% to 82%. It also has on and off period. Re-occurrence of pain is seen in first 6 months. In caesarean section, 51% of women noticed pain back by 1 month and 78% by 6 months. In vaginal delivery it reoccurred in 55% women at 1 month and 85% in 6th month. Conventional physiotherapy interventions are worldwide accepted one and practiced on large scales in various circumstances. Conventional approaches for back pain which includes core muscle exercises, yogic postures, walks, runs, hydrotherapy exercises and cardiorespiratory fitness training. Role of physiotherapy for women’s health is an upcoming area in developing country like India. It needs to be evaluated in both rural and urban set ups. Method: 494 subjects fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Conventional training was given for 6 weeks. Outcome measures used were focusing on Pain (Visual Analogue Scale), Range of motion (Modified Schober Test), abdominal muscle strength (Manual Muscle Testing) and quality of life (Oswestry Low Back Disability). Result: Student t-test was used for statistical analysis. The results showed significant changes in all the outcome measures but was time consuming lacked in establishing confirm evidences. Conclusion: Conventional therapy reduced back pain and improved quality of life but was time constrained. Further evaluation needs to be done for better results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Kanase, S. B., & Patil, S. K. (2022). Influence of Conventional Therapy in Post Natal Women with Back Pain. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, 22(3), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2022/30769
Received 2022-07-19
Accepted 2022-09-26
Published 2022-09-30

 

References

Tavares P, Barrett J, Hogg-Johnson. Prevalence of low back pain, pelvis girdle pain and combination pain in postpartum Ontario population. J Obstetgynaecol Can. 2020 Apr; 42(4): 473–80. PMid: 31864910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.030

Kovacs FM, Garcia E, Royuela A, et al. Spanish back pain research network. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A multicentre study conducted in the Spanish national health service. Spine (Phila Pa 19976). 2012 Aug 1; 37(17):1516–33. PMid: 22333958. https:// doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824dcb74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824dcb74

Turgut F, Turgut M, Çetinşahin M. A prospective study of persistent back pain after pregnancy. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 1998 Sep 1; 80(1):45– 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00080-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00080-3

Ostgaard HC, Andersson GB. Postpartum low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jan; 17(1):53-–5. PMID: 1531555. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199201000-00008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199201000-00008

To WW, Wong MW. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Dec; 82(12):1086–91. PMID: 14616251. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00235.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00235.x

Joshi S, Parikh S. Prevalence of low back pain and its impact on quality of life in post partum. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2016 Nov; 7(11):14342–8.

Khichadiya PM, Kanase SB. Effect of specific transverse abdominal muscle strengthening and conventional therapy for trunk control in paraplegic subjects. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. 2017 Apr; 11(2):2184. https://doi. org/10.5958/0973-5674.2017.00058.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0973-5674.2017.00058.2

Shipton EA. Physical therapy approaches in the treatment of low back pain. Pain and Therapy. 2018 Dec; 7(2):127–37. PMid: 30229473 PMCid: PMC6251828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-018-0105-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-018-0105-x

Cairns MC, Foster NE, Wright C. Randomized controlled trial of specific spinal stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy for recurrent low back pain. Spine. 2006 Sep 1; 31(19):E670–81. PMid: 16946640. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. brs.0000232787.71938.5d DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000232787.71938.5d

Situt G, Kanase S. Effectiveness of NMES and taping on Diastasis Recti in postnatal women. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health. 2021 Sep 30; 21(3):105–11. https://doi. org/10.18311/jeoh/2021/28267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2021/28267

Casagrande D, Gugala Z, Clark SM, Lindsey RW. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015 Sep 1; 23(9):539–49. PMid: 26271756. https://doi.org/10.5435/ JAAOS-D-14-00248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00248

Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, Damen L, Pas MS, Storm J. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics and low back pain. Spine. 2002 Feb 15; 27(4):399–405. PMid: 11840107. https://doi. org/10.1097/00007632-200202150-00015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200202150-00015

Norris CM. Spinal stabilisation: Limiting factors to end-range motion in the lumbar spine. Physiotherapy. 1995 Feb 1; 81(2):64– 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)67047-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)67047-2

Sinaki M, Grubbs NC. Back strengthening exercises: quantitative evaluation of their efficacy for women aged 40 to 65 years. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1989 Jan 1; 70(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(21)01638-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(21)01638-5

Kanotra S, D’Angelo D, Phares TM, Morrow B, Barfield WD, Lansky A. Challenges faced by new mothers in the early postpartum period: An analysis of comment data from the 2000 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2007 Nov; 11(6):549–58. PMid: 17562155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0206-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0206-3