Study to Assess for Improvement in Renal Function following Anderson Hynes Pyeloplasty for Congenital Pelvi Ureteric Obstruction in Children

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Former PG Resident, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN

Keywords:

Anderson Hyles Pyeloplasty, Congenital, Hydronephrosis, Pelvi-ureteric Obstruction

Abstract

Background: Pelvi Ureteric Junction Obstruction (PUJO) is defined as an obstruction to the free flow of urine from the renal pelvis to the proximal ureter1. It is the most common cause of obstructive uropathy in the paediatric age group. Aims: To check for improvement in renal function following Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty for congenital PUJ obstruction and to find out at what age should a child be operated for best improvement in renal functions. Material and Methods: A total of 20 patients undergoing Anderson Hynes Pyeloplasty were included after they satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: In this study it was observed that post Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty, a total of 60% children showed improvement in renal functions, in 30% there was no change in renal function while 10% showed deterioration in renal functions, requiring re-operation. The improvement was statistically significant Mean eGFR in cases improved from 32.25 to 38.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 after Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty. The improvement was statistically significant Mean renal functions in cases improved from 29.05% to 33.7% after Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty. No complications were reported in 85% of the cases after Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty. UTI developed in 2 cases (10%) while pyonephrosis was seen in 1 case (5%). Conclusion: Anderson Hynes Pyeloplasty is an effective treatment for congenital Pelvi Ureteric Junction obstruction in pediatric population. In this study it was observed that the earlier we operate the better is the improvement in function.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Article

 

References

Sikandar AM, Sirajuddin S. Pelvi-ureteric Junction Obstruction in children. Journal of Surgery Pakistan. 2008; 13(4):163–6.

Lee H, Han SW. Uretero-pelvic Junction Obstruction: What we know and what we don’t know. Korean Journal of Urology. 2009; 50(5):423–31. https://doi.org/10.4111/ kju.2009.50.5.423

Rodriguez MM. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014 Oct 1; 33(5-6):293–320. PMid: 25313840 PMCid: PMC4266037.

https://doi.org/10.3109/15513815.2014.959678

Mughal SA, Soomro SI. Pelvi-ureteric Junction Obstruction in children. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International).

Oct; 13:4.

Rasool M, Sheikh HM, Ali S, Ahmed I. Pyeloplasty; Comparison of results of repair with and without stents.

The Professional. 2005; 12:159–65.

Elafifi M, Eltatawy H, Haroon H, Gaber M, Farha MA.

Evaluation of non-stented dismembered pyeloplasty in children suffering from Pelvic Ureteric Junction Obstruction. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2009; 5:52–7.

Castagnetti M, Novara G, Beniamin F, Vezzú B, Rigamonti W, Artibani W. Scintigraphic renal function after unilateral pyeloplasty in children: A systematic review. BJU International. 2008 Oct; 102(7):862–8. PMid: 18336599.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07597.x