Study of Functional Outcome of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique with Implant in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis at L4 and L5 Lev

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra ,IN

Keywords:

Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score

Abstract

Background: Lumbar interbody fusion is the most reliable fusion technique currently available for the lumbar spine as these constructs are biomechanically stronger, provide axial support with less graft subsidence or collapse comparing to those with posterolateral arthrodesis, and produce a better biologic fusion in lordotic alignment1, 2 . Aims and Objectives: To study functional outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique with implant in degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4 and L5 level. Materials and Methods: The study was carried on 34 patients enlisting in the casualty or inpatient department of orthopaedics at a medical college and tertiary health care centre. Only those patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. All the patients were explained about the surgical procedure, the purpose of the study and Informed consent was taken. Results: As per Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Normal results were observed in none of the cases while grade I, II and III was observed in 73.5%, 20.6% and 5.9% cases. Post-op results were observed as normal in 64.7% while Grade I, II and III was observed in 32.4% and 2.9% cases respectively (p<0.01). Conclusion: Present study concluded that although, long-term role of deformity correction and restoration of lumbar spinal balance in cases of spondylolisthesis is yet to be determined, the current study appears to indicate that satisfactory radiological correction of degenerative focal sagittal deformity can be achieved with the insert and-rotate PLIF technique. There appeared to be high levels of patient satisfaction in this relatively short-term study and low levels of complications. Longer-term and comparative clinical outcome studies are required.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Article

 

References

Modabber MR, Jupiter JB. Operative management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus-plate versus nail.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998; 347:93104. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199802000-00012

Campochiaro G, Baudi P, Loschi R, Serafin F, Catani F. Complex fractures of the humeral shaft treated with antegrade locked intramedullary nail: Clinical experience and long-term results. Acta Bio MedicaAtenei Parmensis.

; 86:69-76.

Abel SM. Biocultural variation of skeletal trauma in contemporary Greeks. University of Florida; 2004

Chaudhary P, Karn NK, Shrestha BP, Khanal GP, Paneru S, Kalawar RPS. Dynamic compression plate versus

intramedullary interlocking nail for managemaent of humeral shaft fractures. Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal. 2014; 3:10-3. https://doi.org/10.3126/noaj.

v3i2.9513

Stern P, Mattingly D, Pomeroy D, Zenni E, Kreig J.

Intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1984; 66:639-46.

https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198466050-00001

PMid:6725312

Buckholz RW, Heckman JD, Rockwood, Green’s. Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. p.129:1294

Ghosh S, Halder TC, Chaudhuri A, Datta S, Dasgupta S, Mitra UK. Comparative study of operative treatment of mid shaft fracture of humerus by locking plate versus intramedullary interlocking nail. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2013; 6:390-4 https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.118282

Partap Singh, Vikas Gandhi, Deepak Bansal. Comparative study of compression plating vs interlocking nail in fracture shaft of humerus. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016; 3(11):3385-3388

Jolly A, Bansal R. Shaft humerus fractures treated with interlocking nails vs. locking compression plates: A comparative study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2017; 3(2):117-23.

Singisetti KK, Swarna S, Loknadh L, Ambedkar M.

Comparative study of management of fracture shaft of humerus by interlocking nailing versus plating. In Orthopaedic Proceedings. The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2018 Jan. p. 12-12.

Naga RG, Kolati SR, Bonda Y. Comparative study of functional outcome of dynamic compression plating with interlocking nailing for fracture shaft humerus in adults.

IAIM. 2019; 6(8):102-116.

Saroj DK, Nagaich A, Gupta P. Comparative study of results of ORIF with plating vs. CRIF with nailing in fracture midshaft humerus. International Journal of Orthopaedics.

; 6(1):01-4. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2020.

v6.i1a.1822

Rabari YB, Prasad DV, Somanni AM, Kumar P. Comparative study of functional outcome of dynamic compression plating with intramedullary interlocking nailing in close fracture shaft of humerus in adults. Int J Res Orthop.

; 3:828-32. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.

IntJResOrthop20172881