Clinical Profile of Respiratory Distress in Newborn

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • PG Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms/2018/v5i2/18616

Keywords:

Neonate, Respiratory Distress
Respiratory Distress

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary disorders represent one of the most common diagnoses in infants admitted to neonatal units. The clinical presentation of respiratory distress in the new born includes apnea, cyanosis, grunting, inspiratory stridor, nasal flaring, poor feeding, and tachypnea. Most cases are caused by transient tachypnea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome, or meconium aspiration syndrome, but various other causes are possible. Objectives: Study was performed to analyze clinical profile, risk factors and outcome in terms of mortality. Methods: Data was collected for 78 newborns included in the study with respiratory distress. General information, socioeconomic status, history and clinical examination were documented. Newborn with respiratory distress were shifted to NICU for further management. Time of onset of distress was documented and the severity of the distress was documented and the severity was assessed by using Silverman and Anderson clinical scoring. Duration of O2 therapy, intervention done in the form of surgical/ventilator/surfactant therapy/treatment and mortality was documented to assess the clinical outcome against the final diagnosis. Results: It was seen that in 97.4% of the cases of newborn respiratory distress the cause was respiratory in origin. Majority of the newborns had severe respiratory distress (47.43%) and moderate respiratory distress (46.15%) compared to mild distress (6.4%). 100% of newborns with RDS was diagnosed with severe respiratory distress (5 out of 5) and 73.9% was with diagnosis of MAS (17 out of 23) had developed severe respiratory distress as compared to 29.8% of the neonates with respiratory distress with diagnosis of TTNB (14 out of 47). 55.5% of the newborns (30 out of 54) male babies developed severe respiratory distress compared to 33.3% (8 out of 24) female babies. Interpretation and Conclusions: Transient tachypnea of the newborn is the most common cause of respiratory distress in newborn. Almost 50% of newborn with respiratory distress develop severe respiratory distress which require intensive monitoring. Risk factors like high maternal age, primigravida mothers, Small for gestation age, birth weight less than 2.5Kg associated with severe respiratory distress in newborns.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-17

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

 

References

Edwards MO, Kotecha SJ, Kotecha S. Respiratory distress of the term newborn infant. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013; 14(1):29– 36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2012.02.002 PMid:23347658

Bonafe L, Rubaltelli FF. The incidence of acute neonatal respiratory disorders in Padova county: An epidemiological survey. Acta Paediatr. 1996; 85:1236–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb18236.x PMid:8922091

Chard T, Soe A, Costeloe K: The risk of neo- natal death and respiratory distress syn- drome in relation to birth weight of preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 1997; 14:523–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994327 PMid:9394160

Kumar A, Bhat BV. Epidemiology of respiratory distress of newborns. Indian J Pediatr. 1996; 63:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823875 PMid:10829971

Demissie K, Marcella SW, Breckenridge MB, Rhoads GG. Maternal asthma and transient tachypnea of the newborn. Pediatrics. 1998; 102(1 pt 1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1542/ peds.102.1.84 PMid:9651418

Persson B, Hanson U. Neonatal morbidities in gesta-tional diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(suppl2):B79–84. PMid:9704232

Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97:439–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01150-9 PMid:11239653

Respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn fact sheet. American Lung Association; 2006. Available at: http:// www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp? c=dvLUK9O0E&b=35693

Cleary GM, Wiswell TE. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and the meconium aspiration syndrome.Anupdate. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998; 45:511–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70025-0

Schrag S, Gorwitz R, Fultz-Butts K, Schuchat A. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002; 51(RR11):1–22. PMid:12211284

Benhke ML. Patient assessment-textbook of neonatal and peadiatric respiratorycare; p. 26–33.

Rygal M. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: anautopsy study of 190 cases. Indian J Pediatr. 1985: 52;43–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02754717

Dani C, Reali MF, Bertini G. Risk factors for the development of respiratory distress syndrome and transient tachypnoea in newborn infants. Italian Group of Neonatal Pneumology. Eur Respir J. 1999; 14(1):155-159.

Lureti M. Risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn: A multicenter Italian survey. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecological Scandinavica. 1993; 72(5):359–64. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349309021113