Laboratory Evaluation of Four Fungal Pathogens against the Teak Defoliator, Hyblaea puera (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae)

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Forest Protection Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi 680 653, Thrissur, Kerala ,IN
  • Forest Protection Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi 680 653, Thrissur, Kerala ,IN
  • Forest Protection Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi 680 653, Thrissur, Kerala ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2009/3682

Keywords:

Beauveria bassiana, B. brongniartii, Entomopathogenic Fungi, Hyblaea puera, Metarhizium anisopliae, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus.

Abstract

Effect of four entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana, B. brongniartii, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus and Metarhizium anisopliae, isolated from different host insects, was tested in the laboratory against the teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae) to assess their virulence and efficiency. Five different concentrations, 2x106, 4x106, 6x106, 8x106 and 1x107 conidia ml-1were directly and indirectly applied onto third instar larvae of H. puera. All the four fungi tested under both application methods were pathogenic to H. puera with higher efficiency in direct application than indirect application. At 9 days after exposure, the mean per cent mortality obtained was 100, 93.02, 93.02 and 66.74%, respectively, for B. bassiana, B. brongniartii, P. fumosoroseus and M. anisopliae at the highest concentration of 1 x 107 conidia ml-1 in direct application. Mortality of the larvae varied according to the concentration of conidia, method of application and fungi. The lowest LC50 (1.89 x 106 conidia ml-1) and LT50 (91.18 hr) values obtained for B. bassiana in direct application showed that B. bassiana was more pathogenic to H. puera than the other three fungi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2009-10-17

How to Cite

Juliya, R. F., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., & Varma, R. V. (2009). Laboratory Evaluation of Four Fungal Pathogens against the Teak Defoliator, <I>Hyblaea puera</I> (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae). Journal of Biological Control, 23(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2009/3682

 

References

Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing theeffectiveness of an insecticide. Journal ofEconomic Entomology, 18: 265–267.

Barman, H. K. and Nath, R. K. 2002. Pathogenicity ofentomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassianaon Heortia vitessoides, a major insect pestof Aquilaria agallocha in Assam. InsectEnvironment, 8: 79–80.

Beeson, C. F. C. 1941. The Ecology and Control of theForest Insects of India and the neighbouringcountries. Goverment of India. 720 pp.

Butt, T. M. 2002. Use of entomogenous fungi forthe control of insect pests, pp. 118. In:Kempken, F. (Ed.). The Mycota XI, AgricultureApplications. Springer–Verlag, Berlin,Heidelberg, 2002.

Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit Analysis–3rd Edition.CambridgeUniversity Press. London, England. 318 pp.

Hutacharern, C., Yincharern, S. and Eungwijarnpanya,S. 1993. Control of the teak defoliationby aerial application of Bacillus thuringiensisBerliner var. kurstaki, pp. 5–19. In:B. Boonthawee (Ed.). Proceedings of theForest Conference. Royal Forest Department,Forest Research Office, Bangkok.

Kandaswamy, D. 1969. Hypsipyla robusta Moore, a newhost for Beauveria tenella (Delacroix) Siemasko. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,13: 149–150.

Loganathan, J. and David, P. M. M. 2000. Laboratoryand field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensisBerliner products against the teak defoliatorHyblaea puera Cramer. Insect Science and itsApplication, 20: 61–65.

Mathew, G., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Mohanadas,K. and Nair, K. S. S. 1990. An artificialdiet for the teak defoliator, Hyblaea pueraCramer (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae). Entomon,15: 159–163.

Mohammed Ali, M. I., Varma, R. V. and Sudheendrakumar,V. V. 1991. Evaluation of microbial pathogensfor biocontrol against major insect pests ofAilanthus and Teak, pp. 4–31. KFRI ResearchReport No. 72. KFRI, Peechi, Kerala, India.

Nair, K. S. S., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Varma, R. V. andChacko, K. C. 1985. Studies on the seasonalincidence of defoliators and the effect ofdefoliation on volume increment of teak, pp.78. KFRI Research Report No.30. KFRI,Peechi, Kerala, India.

Nair, K. S. S., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Varma, R. V.,Chacko, K. C. and Jayaraman, K. 1996. Effectof defoliation by Hyblaea puera and Eutectonamachaeralis on volume increment of teak, pp. 257–273. In: Nair, K. S. S., Sharma, J. K. and Varma, R. V. (Eds.). Proceedings of theIUFRO symposium on Impact of Diseases andInsect Pests in Tropical Forests. KFRI, Peechi& FAOFORSPA Bangkok.

Rajak, R. C., Agarwal, G. P., Khan, A. R. and Sandhu,S. S. 1993. Susceptibility of teak defoliator(Hyblaea puera Cramer) and teak skeletonizer(Eutectona machaeralis Walker) to Beauveriabassiana (Balsamo) Vuill. Indian Journal ofExperimental Biology, 31: 80–82.

Sakchoowong, W. 2002. Effect of entomopathogenicfungi (Beauveria bassiana and Metarhiziumanisopliae) on teak defoliator (Hyblaeapuera Cramer, Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae) inlaboratory. 30: pp. 105–110. In: Proceedingsof the IUFRO–FAO Workshop on PestManagement in Tropical Forest Plantations. Chanthaburi, Thailand. 25–29 May, 1998. FORSPA Publication.

Senguttuvan, T., Chinniah, C., Varma, R. V. and Nair,K. S. S. 2000. Knockdown toxicity ofinsecticides and B.t. formulations on larvae ofteak defoliator, Hyblaea puera. Indian Journalof Forestry, 23: 160–163.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>