Functional response of green lacewing, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen) to its prey, cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L.

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Entomology, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan - 173230, Himachal Pradesh ,IN
  • Department of Entomology, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan - 173230, Himachal Pradesh ,IN
  • Department of Entomology, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan - 173230, Himachal Pradesh ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2023/35545

Keywords:

Brevicoryne brassicae, cabbage aphid, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi, functional response, green lacewing

Abstract

Functional response influences the prey-predator interactions and hence is crucial for assessing the predatory potential of a given species. Laboratory studies were conducted at Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India during 2019-20 to assess the functional response of a generalist predator, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) against the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L. The feeding efficiency of larvae of C. zastrowi sillemi against varying densities of aphid i.e. 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 was evaluated. The number of aphids consumed differed with prey densities and it was in direct proportion to the host density. All the three instars of C. zastrowi sillemi followed type II functional response. The attack rate (a) of the third instar larvae was maximum compared to first and second instars indicating the higher efficiency of later instar in prey consumption. Other parameters viz., the effectiveness of predator (a/th) and maximum predation rate (K) also followed similar trend while the prey handling time (Th) by the first instar took longer period (0.50 h) compared to second and third instars (0.46 h and 0.27 h, respectively). Searching efficiency was highest in the third instar which can be attributed to the higher mobility of fully grown larvae.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

P. SREE CHANDANA, ANIL SOOD, & SHARMA, P. L. (2023). Functional response of green lacewing, <i>Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi</i> (Esben-Petersen) to its prey, cabbage aphid, <i>Brevicoryne brassicae</i> L. Journal of Biological Control, 37(3), 177–180. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2023/35545

Issue

Section

Research Articles

 

References

Alhamawandy, S. A. 2017. Functional response of common green lace wing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) on black bean aphid Aphis fabae (Scopoli). J Agric Vet Sci, 10: 2319-2380.

Bashir, F., Azim, N. M., Akhter, N. and Muzaffar, G. 2013. Effect of texture/morphology of host plants on the biology of Brevicoryne brassicae L. (Homoptera: Aphididae). Int J Curr Res, 5: 178-180.

Beddington, J. R. 1975.Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on search efficiency. J Anim Ecol, 44: 331-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3866

Bhalla, O. P. 1990. Integrated pest management strategy in vegetable crops. Summer Institute of Production Technology of off-season vegetable and seed crops. June 15 to July 4, 1990. Department of Vegetable Crops. Dr. Y. S. Paramat University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, (HP) (pp. 234-245).

Hassell, M. P. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Holling, C. S. 1959. Some interactions of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol, 9: 385-398. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent91385-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent91385-7

Jamaya, L. M., and Ronald, F. L. 1998. Brevicoryne brassicae Linn. Department of Entomology. Honolulu University, Hawaii.

Principi, M. M., and Canard, M. 1984. Feeding habits. In: Canard M, Semeria Y, New TR (eds). Biology of Chrysopidae. The Hague, Dr W. Junk Publishers.

Rogers, D. J. 1972. Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol, 41: 369-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/3474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3474

Saljoqi, A., Asad, N., Khan, J., Ehsan-ul-haq, Nasir, M. K., Zada, H., Ahmad, B., Nadeem, M. Y., Huma, Z., and Salim, M. 2016. Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea Stephen (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) fed on cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) under laboratory conditions. Pak J Zool, 48: 165-169.

Singh, S. P., and Jalali, S. K. 1994. Production and use of Chrysopid predators. Technical Bulletin No. 10, Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore.

Solomon, M. E. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol, 18: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1578

Sultan, A., and Khan, F. 2014. Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to sugarcane whitefly, Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) in laboratory conditions. J Insect Behav, 27: 454-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9442-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9442-8

Thompson, W. R. 1975. The specificity of host relation in predacious insects. Can Entomol, 83: 262-269. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent83262-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent83262-10

Venkatesan, T., Poorani, J., Murthy, K. S., Jalali, S. K., Kumar, G. A., Lalitha, Y., and Rajeshwari, R. 2008. Occurrence of Chrysoperla zastrowi arabica (Henry et al.) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), a cryptic song species of Chrysoperla (carnea-group), in India. Biol Control, 22: 143-147.