Evaluation of Bioagents for their Compatibility in the Development of Consortium for Enhanced Efficacy

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145, Uttarakhand ,IN
  • Department Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145, Uttarakhand ,IN
  • Department Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145, Uttarakhand ,IN
  • Department Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145, Uttarakhand ,IN
  • Department Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar - 263145, Uttarakhand ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2020/23179

Keywords:

Chickpea, Microbial Consortia, Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Biological Control

Abstract

The concept of development of microbial consortia for bio-control relies on the fact that bioagents under natural habitats live in communities with some benefits for plants. Application of bioagents in a consortium may improve efficacy, reliability and consistency of the bioagents even under diverse soil and environmental conditions. Diversity in biocontrol mechanisms offered by each bioagent in consortium may help in enhancing disease suppressiveness and may also strengthen the capabilities of the partners in an additive or synergistic manner. Till now no guideline has been published for the evaluation of bioagents to test their compatibility before developing bioagent consortium. In the present studies compatibility among biocontrol potential Trichoderma-Pseudomonas and Trichoderma-Trichoderma isolates was studied by dual culture, mixed formulations and using cell free cultures. In dual culture all the combinations (14 no.) were found compatible with each other as no isolate inhibited the growth of one-another i.e. absence of  inhibition zone. All the mixed formulations of potential Trichoderma-Pseudomonas isolates (8 no.) were found compatible with each other as they were growing simultaneously on PDA without antagonizing the growth of other or formation of inhibition zone in their combinations. The cell free cultures of each Trichoderma and Pseudomonas isolates tested with each other using Food Poison Technique showed synergistic effects on their fresh mycelial weight among some combinations while majority showed no significant differences with their checks. Further all the combinations (14 no.) were tested for their effects on seed germination and vigour index of chickpea in glasshouse. All the combinations showed significantly better seed germination while some combinations viz. Th14+Psf173, TCMS36+Psf173,Th17+Th19,Th17+Psf2,Th17+TCMS36 and Th14+Psf2 showed better plant vigour index (43.5 to 44.9% ) as compared to their checks (28.8 to 41.5%).These guidelines could be used before developing bioagent consortium and evaluation in field for crop health management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2020-10-20

How to Cite

Amirthalingam, V., Tewari, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, R., & Kumar, J. (2020). Evaluation of Bioagents for their Compatibility in the Development of Consortium for Enhanced Efficacy. Journal of Biological Control, 34(2), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2020/23179

Issue

Section

Research Notes

 

References

Arras G, Arru S. 1997. Mechanism of action of some microbial antagonists against fungal pathogens. Ann Microbiol Enzymol. 47: 97-120.

Dandurand LM, Knudsen GR. 1993. Influence of Pseudomonas flourescens on hyphal growth and biocontrol, activity of Trichoderma harzianum in the spermosphere of pea. Phytopathol. 83: 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-83-265

Elad Y, Freeman S. 2002. Biological control of fungal plant pathogens. In: The Mycota XI: Agricultural Applications. Kempken, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

Hubbard JP, Harman GE, Hadar Y. 1983. Effect of soil borne. Pseudomonas spp. on the biological control agent, Trichoderma hamatum. on pea seeds. Phytopathology 73: 655-659.https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-73-655

Jhumishree M, Singh SN, Sonkar SS. 2018. Growth promotion of chickpea plant on treatment with native isolates of Trichoderma spp. J Pharmacog Phytochem. 7: 1631-1636

Kharb RPS, Lather BPS, Deswal DP. 1994. Prediction of field emergence through heritability and genetic advance of vigour parameters. Seed Sci Technol. 82: 461-466.

Manjula K, Krishna Kishore G, Girish AG, Singh SD. 2004.Combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride has an improved biocontrol activity against stem rot in groundnut. Plant Pathol J. 20: 75-80. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2004.20.1.075

Raupach GS, Kloepper JW. 1998. Mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology 88: 1158-1164. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.11.1158 PMid:18944848

Rini CR, Sulochana KK. 2007. Usefulness of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum infecting tomato. J Trop Agric.45:21–28.

Sharma T, Navin K, Nishant R. 2012. Isolation, screening and characterization of PGPR isolates from rhizosphere of rice plants in Kashipur region (Tarai region). Biotechnol Int. 5: 69–84.

Sivakumar D, Wijeratnam RSW, Wijesundera RLC, Marikar FMT, Abeyesekere M. 2000. Antagonistic effect of Trichoderma harzianum on post harvest of Rambutan, (Nephelium lappaceum) Phytoparasitica 28: 240247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981802 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981802

Thakkar A, Saraf M. 2015. Development of microbial consortia as a biocontrol agent for effective management of fungal diseases in Glycine max L. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 48: 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235 408.2014.893638

Most read articles by the same author(s)