Evaluation of Root and Canal Morphology of Mandibular Premolars in Urban Indian Population: An In-Vivo Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study


Affiliations

  • Ahmedabad Dental College and Hospital, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ahmedabad, India

Abstract

Background: Inability to recognize anatomical variations in roots and canal configurations remains one of the principal factors in failure of endodontic therapy. Mandibular premolars, due to their varied internal morphology, present an endodontic challenge more often than other teeth.

Objective: To assess the root morphology and canal configuration of mandibular first and second premolars using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography imaging (3D CBCT).

Methodology: Bilaterally, mandibular premolars were evaluated on 100 CBCT images independently by two experienced endodontists. Vertucci's classification was used to identify and divide the canal configurations.

Results: 97% of first premolars and 99.5% of the second premolars were found to have one root. The most common canal configuration was found to be Type-I. Other types of canal configurations were 5.5% and 5% in first and second premolars respectively.

Conclusions: Modern-day endodntist needs to be vigilant at all times to avoid missing canals and consequent failures.


Keywords

Root Morphology, Mandibular Premolars, Vertucci's Classification, Canal Configuration, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Subject Discipline

Dentistry

Full Text:

References

Dahlberg A. Geographic distribution andorigin ofdentitions. Int Dent J 1965; 15:348-55.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58:589-99.

Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001; 34:359-70.

Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy: road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979; 23:555-73.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedure. Endod topics 2005; 10:3-29.

Baisden MK, Kulild JC, Weller RN. Root canal configuration of the mandibbular first premolar. J Endod 1992; 18:505-8.

Tzanetakis GN, Lagoudakos TA, Kontakiotis EG. Endodontic treatment of a mandibular second premolarwiht four canals using operating microcope. J Endod 2007; 33:31821.

Rodig T, Hulsmann M. Diagnosis and root canal treatment of a mandibular second premolar with three root canals. Int Endod J 2003; 36:912-9.

De Moor RJ, Calberson FL. Root canal treatment in a mandibular second premolar with three root canals. J Endod 2005; 31:310-13.

Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the Pulp. 8th edition. St Louis: CV Mosby; 2006. p. 216-9.

Fan B, Yang J, Gutmann JL. Root canal systems in mandibular first premolars with C-shaped root configurations. Part I: micro computed tomography mapping of the radicular groove and associated rootcanal cross sections. J Endod 2008; 34:1337-41.

Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, Zhang R, Tian YY, Wang H, et al. Cone-bram computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging 2012; 12:18.

Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction inmaxillofacial imagingusing low dose ConeBeam CT. Eir J Radiol 2005; 56:413-7.

Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Inamoto K, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Effectiveness of ddental computed tomography indiagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion ofeach root of amultirooted tooth: a case report. J Endod 2006; 32:583-7.

Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pahology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103:114-9.

Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PMH. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J 2011; 44:162-9.

Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Fundamental efficiency of limitedd cone-beam X-ray CT (3DX multi image micro CT) for practical use. Dent Radiol 2000; 40:145-54.

Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009; 42:463-75.

Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, Horner K, Mannocci F. The detection and management of root resorption lesions usingintraoral radiology and cone beam computed tomography: an vitro investigation. Int Endod J 2009; 42:831-8.

Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007; 33:121-32.

Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008; 34:87-9.

Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod 2007; 33:509-16.

Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: a literature review. J Endod 2007; 33:1031–7.

Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod 2006; 32:932–6.

Jain A, Bahuguna R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a gujarati population- an in vitro study. Dent Res J 2011; 8(3):118-22.

Khedmat S, Assadian H, Saravani AA. Root canal morphology of the mandibular first premolars in an Iranian population using cross-sections and radiography. J Endod 2010; 36(2):214–7.

Mozzo P, Procacci C, Taconi A. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1999; 8:155864.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:47-50.

Zillich R, Dawson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 36:738-44.

Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod 1986; 12(8):343–5.

Iyer V, Indira R, Ramachandran S, Srinivasan M. Anatomical variations of mandibular premolars in Chennai population. Ind J Dent Res 2006; 17(1):7-10.

Park JB, Kim N, Park S, Kim Y, Ko Y. Evaluation of root anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean population with cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2013; 7:94–101.

Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R. Root and canalmorphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Intl Endod J 2012; 45(11):996– 1003.

Kottoor J, Albuqurque D, Velmurugan N, Kuruvilla J. Root anatomy and root canal configurationof human permanent mandibular premolars: A systemic review. Anat Res Int 2013. Article ID 254250.

Yoshioka T, Villegas JC, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Radiographic evaluation of root canalmultiplicity inmandibular first premolars. Journal of Endodontics 2004; 30(2):73–4.

Parekh V, Shah N, Joshi H. Root canal morphology and variations of mandibular premolars by clearing technique: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12(4):318–21.

Sikri VK, Sikri P. Mandibular premolars: aberrations in pulp space morphology. Ind J Dent Res 1994; 5(1):9-14.

Sandhya R, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in the Indian population using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. Ind J Dent Res 2010; 21(2):169-73.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.