Factor Exploration and Hierarchical Analysis of Spectrum Pricing: Exploratory Framework


Affiliations

  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Department of Management Studies, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Radio spectrum, a scarce resource, refers to the part of the electromagnetic spectrum that corresponds to radio frequencies. These frequencies of up to 300 GHz are known as radio waves and used for radio communications. Telecom and broadcast services industries along with government agencies utilize this spectrum and create infrastructure that allows the emergence of information- driven societies. This makes radio spectrum a crucial resource for any economy. Given its importance in the development of a nation, it is of critical importance to effectively manage this resource. If spectrum policies are formulated carefully, it would not only lead to sustained growth of information broadcasting and communication technology industries, thereby promoting social welfare, but also maximize the revenues generated for the government. This paper explains about three important effects on the scarce radio frequency spectrum. Spectrum management and the need for a valuation framework are being discussed. We looked at three allocation methods (Auction, Beauty Contest and Administrative Allocation) in greater detail. The aim of this study is to develop a total interpretive structure modelling (TISM) framework for spectrum pricing index. The primary objective of the study is to identify the generic factors influencing Spectrum Pricing and subsequently develop the linkages and hierarchy of factor for Spectrum Pricing by using interpretive structure modelling (ISM) and total interpretive structure modelling (TISM) and also subsequently develops the framework. The exploratory framework for spectrum Pricing is not available for regulators, Policy Planner and Industry. This study fulfils that gap.

Keywords

Grounded Theory, ISM, Spectrum Pricing, TISM.

Subject Discipline

Business Management

Full Text:

References

Sivasankari SV, Sagar M, Agrawal DP. Spectrum Auctioning and Licensing in Telecom Industry. Economic and Political Weekly. 2009 Jan 17.

Jain R. Spectrum auctions in India: lessons from experience. Telecommunications Policy. 2001; 25(10-11):671–88.

Baskerville R, Pries-Heje J. Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies. 1999; 9(1):1–23.

Mehmetoglu M, Altinay L. Examination of grounded theory analysis with an application to hospitality research. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2006; 25(1):12–33.

Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. QualSociol. 1990; 13(1):3–21.

Datta D. Spectrum Auction and Investment in Telecom Industry - A Suggested Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Glaser BG. Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociological Press; 1992.

Glaser B, Strauss A, Strutzel E. The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Nursing Research. 1968;17(4):364.

Hazlett T. Liberalizing US spectrum allocation. Telecommunications Policy. 2003; 27(7):485–99.

Hazlett TW. Spectrum Tragedies. Yale Journal on Regulation. 2005; 243–73.

Malik P. Indian Telecommunication Policy and Regulation: Impact on Investment and Market Structure. WDR. 2004.

Prasad UC, Suri RK. Modelling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modelling (TISM). Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2011; 12(3, 4):31–40.

Sushil. Interpretive matrix: a tool to aid interpretation of management and social research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2005; 6(2):27–30.

Prasad R, Sridhar V. Allocative efficiency of the mobile industry in India and its implications for spectrum policy. Telecommunications Policy. 2009; 33(9):521–33.

Sridhar V, Prasad R. Towards a new policy framework for spectrum management in India. Telecommunications Policy. 2011; 35(2):172–84.

Sushil. Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2012; 13(2):87–106.

Warfield J. Societal systems. New York: Wiley; 1976.

Zheng C. High Bids and Broke Winners. Journal of Economic Theory. 2001; 100(1):129–71.

Warfield J. Toward Interpretation of Complex Structural Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1974; 4(5):405–17.

Valletti T. Spectrum Trading. Telecommunications Policy. 2001; 25:655–70.

Crocioni P. Is allowing trading enough? Making secondary markets in spectrum work. Telecommunications Policy. 2009; 33:451–68.

McMillan John. Why auction the spectrum? Telecommunications policy. 1995; 19(3):191–9.

Martin C, Doyle C, Webb W. Essentials of modern spectrum management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

Xavier P, Ypsilanti D. Policy Issues in spectrum Trading. Info. 2006; 8(2):34–61.

William MH. Spectrum auctions and efficient resource allocation: learning from the 3G experiences in Europe. info. 2001; 3(1):5–13.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.