Failure Analysis of Connecting Rods and Engine Blocks of Small Generators
Authors
-
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kano State polytechnic ,NG
Kabiru Bashir -
Hydraulic Equipment Development Institute, Kano ,NGI. Y. Tokarawa
-
School of Technology, Binyaminu Usman Polytechnic Hadejia ,NGMusa Hassan Muhammad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24906/isc/2020/v34/i2/196421Keywords:
Generator, Chemical Analysis, Copper, Magnesium, Manganese, Hardness, Connecting Rod, Engine Block.Abstract
Three small generators were selected for conducting the failure analyses. The generators tagged FG1(2.7kVA, SG2700), FG2(2.7kVA, TG2700, TIGER) and FG3(2.5kVA ELEPAQ, EC2500CXS) were first dismantled and the components inspected for physical examination. In all the three generators the Connecting Rods were found to have broken into pieces. Two of the engine blocks were pierced by the broken connecting rods. Chemical analysis tests were made on the Connecting Rods and Engine Blocks using XRFNiton analyzer. The tests revealed that all the components were made from Aluminum alloys. The Copper contents for the Connecting Rods were found to be from 1.77% to 2.37% which were below 4.0% minimum requirement for Connecting Rods and other components of high performance engines based on Aluminum Association (AA) and British Standard (BS) specifications. The Connecting Rods also contained up to 2.01% Iron but none of the Connecting Rods had Magnesium which is an important element for increasing strength of Aluminum alloys. The high content of iron coupled with lack of Magnesium resulted in low strength and increased hardness, making the Connecting Rods brittle and highly susceptible to fatigue failure. Hardness tests conducted on the Connecting Rods using Rockwell Hardness Testing machine gave 160,151 and 175 BHN which were much higher than maximum of 105 BHN for AA and BS specifications. Similarly, the hardness values of the Engine Blocks were found to be 128,160 and 140BHN respectively. The corresponding tensile strengths of the Engine Blocks were 167,149 and 152MPa which were lower than the minimum AA and BS specification of 170MPa.The results concluded that the Connecting Rods of the three generators failed due to excessive brittleness.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
O.T. Araromi, (2009). Determination of Failure Modes of Bearings of Rotary Furnace,Seminar 1 report submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering Bayero University Kano.
ASMMetals Handbook Vol. 10Failure Analysis and Prevention 8th ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1975
ASTM Metals Handbook Vol. 11 Failure Analysis and Prevention 8th edition, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986
W. Bolton (2000) Engineering MaterialsHB: 3rd Edition; Newnes Oxford
V. J. Colangelo and F. A. Herser(1987); Analysis Of Metallurgical Failures; Second Edition; John Wiley & Sons New York
J. A. Collins and S. A. Daniewiaz(2002); Failure Mode: Performance And Service Requirement For Metals. First Edition, John Wiley & Sons New York
J.A. Collins (1993), Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design; Analysis, Prediction, Prevention, 2nd ed. John Wiley& Sons, New York 8. T. Davidson (1999), An Introduction to Failure Analysis, Wikipedia page32.
M. Fonte, V. Infante, M. Freitas, L. Reis, (2016) XV Portuguese Conference on Fracture, 10-12 Paço de Arcos, Portugal Failure mode analysis of two diesel engine crankshafts
S. B. Hassan, S. A. Salihu and A. I. Obi (2008) Effect of using vegetable oils as austempering quenchants on the microstructure and mechanical properties of low alloyed ST steel, Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol.3, No.2,Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
X. Hou, Y. Li, and T. Jiang, (2011) Fracture Failure Analysis of Ductile Cast Iron Crankshaft in a Vehicle EngineJournal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 11(1), February, 2011 pp 10-16 12. A. Jack, & Collins (1993) Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design, second edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
R.K. Jain, (2009), Production Technology; 16th edition; Khanna Publishers, Delhi.
S. Kalpakjian & Steven R. Schmid, (2006), Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, fifth edition. Pearson, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA
M. Kutz, (2002); Hand book of Materials Selection, second edition, published by Wiley & Sons, New York.
W. T. Matthews, (VA 1973) Plane Strain Fracture Toughness Data Handbook for Metals, Report No. AMMRC MS 73-6, U.S. Army Material Command NTIS Springfield.
D. Munz, and T. Fett, (1999) Ceramic Mechanical Properties, Failure Behavior, Materials Selection, springer Berlin
E.C. Rollason, (1973) Metallurgy for Engineers, fourth edition, ELBS Edward Arnold.
G. Sines and M. Adams, (1978) Compression Testing of Ceramics, Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics Vol. 3 Phenam,New York.
P.C Sharma, (2005) “A Textbook of Production Technology (Manufacturing Processes)†Reprint Edition, S. Chand and Company Ltd, New Delhi.
Dr. S. Singh, (2005), Mechanical Engineering Handbook, second edition, Khanna Publishers.
G. F. Vander Voort, (2001) Conducting the Failure Examination, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention1(2), April 2001 pp 14 – 19 23. www.wiley.com/engineering, (2002), Metallurgical &Mechanical Failure Analysis, consulting and testing.
Xiao-lei Xu, Zhi-wei Yu and Zhi Yang (2011) Truck Diesel Engine Crankshaft Failure Analysis, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 11(1), February 2011 pp51-55
X. Xu, and Z. Yu, (2007)Failure Analysis of a Diesel Engine Connecting Rod. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 7(5), October 2007 (pp316-320)
X. Xu, and Z. Yu, (2011) Failure Analysis of a Truck Diesel Engine Crankshaft made from Spheroidal Cast Iron, Journal of Failure Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 11(4), 2011 pp332-336
M. Zamanzadeh, E. Lakin and D. Gibbon (2004), A Re-Examination of Failure Analysis and Root Cause Determination. Failure in Metallurgy, MATCO Associates, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, Research, USA(www.linkedin.com)
