The Study of Zooplankton Community in Unmanaged Pond Ecosystem in Bankura District, West Bengal and the Effect of Temperature, pH, Dissolved O2, Free CO2 Level in the Community

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Zoology, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal ,IN
  • Department of Zoology, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal ,IN
  • Department of Zoology, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal ,IN
  • Department of Zoology, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal ,IN
  • Department of Zoology, Bankura Christian College, Bankura-722101, West Bengal ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24906/isc/2017/v31/i5/161488

Keywords:

Zooplankton, Pond Ecosystem, Critical t-Value.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diversity of zooplankton in a local pond
ecosystem. Zooplankton plays a very important role in the food chain of pond ecosystem
and its diversity is one of the determinant of shaping the food chain. Its diversity will
ultimately decide the nature of the pond community. During our investigation in local
pond, we have gathered various types of zooplanktons like Cyclops, Daphnia, Cypris,
and Moina. Their number was influenced by the effect of pH (measured by digital pH
meter), temperature (measured by thermometer), free CO2 level (estimated by APHA
method), and dissolved O2 (estimated by Winkler’s method). The season wise variation
of zooplankton in pond indicate the different environmental condition in water bodies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

Majhi, O., Sarkar, A., Mandal, S. B., Sarkar, M., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). The Study of Zooplankton Community in Unmanaged Pond Ecosystem in Bankura District, West Bengal and the Effect of Temperature, pH, Dissolved O<sub>2</sub>, Free CO<sub>2</sub> Level in the Community. Indian Science Cruiser, 31(5), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.24906/isc/2017/v31/i5/161488

Issue

Section

Search & Survey

 

References

APHA 1915. American Public Health Associationstandard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.Washington D.C.

SE Bunn and AH Arthington, 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.Environ. management. 30(4):492-507.

Z Dulic, V Mitrovic-Tutundzic, Z Markovic and I Zivic, 2006. Monitoring water quality using zooplankton organisms as bioindicators at the Dubica fish farm, Serbia.Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade,58(4):245-8.

AK lilzadeh, SM Yamakanamardi and K Altaff, 2008. Abundance of zooplankton in three contrasting lakes of Mysore city, Karnataka state, India.

M Karuthapandi, DV Rao, B Xavier Innocent, 2013. Zooplankton composition and diversity of Umdasager, Hyderabad. Int. J. Life Sci. Edu. Res.1(1):21-6.

BG Kolhe, SP Zambare, SB Andhale, MS Rane, 2013. An estimation of plankton population of Godavari River with reference to pollution.Bios. Disc.,4(1):117-20.

B Mani, SA Gaikwad, 1998. Physico-chemical characteristics of lakePokhran. Ind. Jour. Env. Toxicol.,8:56-8.

R Purushothama, HA Sayeswara, MA Goudar, K Harishkumar, 2011. Physicochemical profile and zooplankton community composition in BrahmanaKalasi Tank, Sagar, Karnataka, India.99-103.

RA Ryder, SR Kerr, KH Loftus, HA Regier, 1974. The morphoedaphic index, a fish yield estimator—review and evaluation. J. Fish.Re.s Board. Can.,31(5):663-88.

CS Singh, AP Sharma, BP Deorari, 1993. Plankton Population in relation to fisheries in Nanak Sagar reservoir, Nanital.Recent Advances of Fresh Water Biology, 1:66-79.

• PS Welch. Limnological Studies Methods XVIII. 1952. MacGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York.

Most read articles by the same author(s)